<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Department of Veteran Affairs Site Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.veteransbenefitsgibill.com/2009/11/12/va-site-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.veteransbenefitsgibill.com/2009/11/12/va-site-update/</link>
	<description>A resource for military veterans to discover the educational opportunities and support being offered through the Post 9-11 GI Bill</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legislation May Extend GI Bill to National Guard &#124; Veterans Benefits GI Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.veteransbenefitsgibill.com/2009/11/12/va-site-update/#comment-7656</link>
		<dc:creator>Legislation May Extend GI Bill to National Guard &#124; Veterans Benefits GI Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 22:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veteransbenefitsgibill.com/?p=359#comment-7656</guid>
		<description>[...] September introduction, it&#8217;s received 22 co-sponsors and has received a referral to the House Veterans Affairs Committee. DefenseLink unfortunately reports though that the VA has no intentions of passing GI [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] September introduction, it&#8217;s received 22 co-sponsors and has received a referral to the House Veterans Affairs Committee. DefenseLink unfortunately reports though that the VA has no intentions of passing GI [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

